ok, but your claim was that he edited it to remove the word, and then went back and edited it back in. Lets assume for a second that he did do it, and his reason for removing the word was you calling him out for saying it, then you called him out again for removing it, so lets assume this is the point where he edited the word back in. At that point, there would definitely had been an edit mark, because some time had passed since the initial post. So, even assuming the mark didnt show up for the first edit, it would have for the second edit. I just personally think it was an accusation that wasnt true, i never saw the word removed, and i read it when it was initially posted, and multiple times after at different times(mainly to catch up on the posts on here, because petty internet drama is fun to read). On top of that, he has no real reason to edit it out, its clear he doesnt care what people here think of him, so he has no real reason to cover it up. He even used it in the OP, which he did edit, so if he really wanted to cover up the fact that he used the word, then wouldnt he have removed it there too? He basically called the entire HB community that word in that post. Im not saying hes a nice guy, or he went about presenting his points in the best way, what i am saying is that i highly doubt he actually edited his post multiple times to remove then put back the word in question.